Suicidal Snowflakes

Just because I have a short attention span doesn\’t mean I…

Oh Honey.


Oh honey. It’ s not right. Or flattering, either.

I used to really like Charlotte Church. And I know, I know, she’s 18, she wants to be a sexy grownup, bla bla bla. But I really did like her clean image. She has a good voice, she does good music that isn’t retarded pop (or at least she used to. I’ve seen her new video, and it’s a little frightening)… She was an ARTIST, not a CLONE that CALLED herself a recording artist. She’s got Britney’s earrings, Hillary’s hair and Christina’s outfit. LaLohan has already asked for her shoes back.

Whyyyyyyyy?

WHYYYYYYYYYY?

All I can really hope for, I guess, is that she comes to her senses and starts doing real music again. Next thing you know, Josh Groban is gunna go grunge, and then I’ll just haveta stick the gun in my mouth.

Sigh.

Sigh.

Lord. It’s so OLD… they turn 18, and until they’re like 25, they try to show off how “grownup” they are, and express their “womanhood” by dressing in PVC with their boobs hanging out. Of course, being a sex object is the only version of womanhood the pop princesses will subscribe to, even though it’s not the only one out there. They all try it, and they ALL go Super Slut rout. Exploiting your sexuality and sex is so… last century. It’s BORING to me, and mostly just makes me sad for the guys and girls that do it. I wouldn’t be sad at all if the next big thing was high necked collars and victorian fashions. Whips and chains and Pleather are so… OVERDONE.

Advertisements

October 3, 2005 - Posted by | Glitterati

6 Comments »

  1. You think one would want to go “non-conformist” and wear turtleknecks or something. They’d have the allure of the unknown at least.

    Comment by HMC | October 3, 2005

  2. I would never of watched Britney’s “Hit me baby one more time video” is she did not have perkies & look so sexy in that school girl outfit.

    Comment by Anonymous | October 4, 2005

  3. Well, that’s a testament to how bad her music is and the damage overly sexual little girls has on the male IQ.

    Comment by HMC | October 4, 2005

  4. Yum hum. Instead of the work standing on it’s own, it requires hard bodies to sell because the work is crap. Further evidence thereof.

    Comment by TLG | October 4, 2005

  5. The problem is that she’s not a hard body anymore.

    Comment by James | October 5, 2005

  6. She never was. She was always soft and girly. Now she’s trying to be a porn star. *sigh*

    Comment by TLG | October 5, 2005


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: